An entity: has an identity; contains value objects; may contain other entities; can be mutable; Lets use Customer as an example: Our customer has an identity and two value objects. It’s not always clear whether to model a domain concept as value object or entity. Entities live in continuum, so to speak. In all cases, I should be able to represent our conceptual model in our code, and it should make sense to our domain expert, as they’ll see the Ubiquitous Language represented. In this context, business cards are value objects. The section 751(a) and (b) proposed regulations apply both aggregate and entity principles at the same time in the case of a sale of a partnership interest where the partnership holds both hot and cold assets and both assets have declined in value at the time of the sale of the partnership interest by the partner. This makes it easier to maintain aggregate consistency boundaries since you cannot even accidentally change the state of one aggregate from within another. Aggregate is a pattern in Domain-Driven Design. So whether an object is an Entity or a Value Object really depends on the context of how you are using it within your application. Value objects allow you to perform certain tricks for performance, thanks to their immutable nature. In traditional object-oriented design, you might start modeling by identifying nouns and verbs. Query (3) uses an aggregate function count in the selection. Not for non-US citizens, what about a Kiwi Bob Smith? For example, the following implementation would leave the object in an invalid state… Think about an aggregate for a car with the car as the root entity and tire as a value object within the aggregate. Only an object representing a Domain concept can be classified as an Entity (it has an id) or a VO (it encapsulates a simple or composite value). The Address value object can now live by its own because we are able to delete a Person row from the database without deleting the corresponding Address row. When the conceptual model we create with the domain expert is realized effectively in code, we’ll find that not only to technical refactorings become easier, but enhancements to our model as well. ; Query (2) uses a more specific selection by selecting only the ID and NAME column values from the table. To define the differences between entities and value objects, we need to introduce three types of equality which come into play when we need to compare objects to each other. I model entities with reference objects (classes), and I give them a surrogate identity (i.e., probably a GUID). or "How much money all our users possess?" Entities Have an Identity and a Life. Entity Approach 1. Address? It allows to convert Object to bytes and then bytes to Object. Value Objects should represent concepts in your Ubiquitous Language, and a domain expert should be able to recognize it in your model. Aggregate vs. I am too young to make my own judgement on this. This design also makes sense if you mentally replace the fields that regard to Address with a single integer as I suggested previously. We can just replace the existing object with the one we just instantiated and forget about it altogether. So what we have in this example is an aggregate consisting of a single entity, the Purchase Order (functioning as the root of the aggregate), and a set of one or more associated Line Item value objects. 2. An example may be an order and its line-items, these will be separate objects, but it's useful to treat the order (together with its line items) as a single aggregate. The topic described in this article is a part of my Domain-Driven Design in Practice Pluralsight course. After revisiting it, you might notice that in your domain, addresses don’t actually have their own inherent identity and can be used interchangeably. But when checking the Color of a specific PaintBucket, the Color has no identity in an of itself. In the example above, we treat money interchangeably, which makes this concept a value object. An Aggregate enforces invariants for all its Entities for any operation it supports. doesn’t make any sense because it doesn’t convey proper context. "entity vs value object" That is essence of my question. A simpler version of that technique is to compare a value object to an integer. In this post, I’d like to talk about differences between Entity vs Value Object in more detail. Nevertheless, I didn’t find any with an exhaustive, comprehensive description, so I decided to create my own. Within an Aggregate, the other players can be Entities or VOs as the domain dictates. In each of these examples, a Person is identified by more than their attributes, such as Name, Address, PhoneNumber, etc. Value objects, at the same time, have a zero lifespan. Additionally, my model must include what it means to have the same identity. On the contrary, entities are almost always mutable. Entities in this situation would act as wrappers upon them and represent more high-level functionality. One of my favorite quotes from Evans’ book is: Translation blunts communication and makes knowledge crunching anemic. From Evans, the rules we need to enforce include: That’s a lot of rules! The topic described in this article is a part of my Domain-Driven Design in Practice Pluralsight course. For example, consider a Person concept. All of this state is passed via the parameterized constructor. All three objects: customer, contact and address are considered data entities. Many objects have no conceptual identity. Value Object vs Data Transfer Object. According to DDD concepts, we need to think about our domain models and its invariants, recognise entities, value objects as well as aggregate roots. In this post, I’d like to talk about differences between Entity vs Value Object in more detail. For example, if I have a system that models Paint buckets, the Color is a great candidate for a Value Object. But since Customer is an Entity, only its id will be part of the Order aggregate. For example, consider a Person concept. An entity is different from a Value Object primarily due to the fact that an Entity has an identity while a Value Object … If you're pulling it from the PreImage or PostImage collections, make sure your images are set up correctly. The concept of money in such case would be a value object. Let’s say we have two classes in our domain model: Person entity and Address value object: How would the database structure look like in this case? In DDD modeling, I try to key in on terms coming out of our Ubiquitous Language that exhibit a thread of identity. It’s not always clear if a concept in your domain model is an entity or a value object. So if Name isn’t a Person’s distinguishing attribute, what is? 48 Park Avenue, East 21st Street, Apt. Le résultat de func remplace la valeur agrégée précédente. Entities have a history; value objects have a zero lifespan. We have an aggregate of: entity: Poll (representing a question) two or more value objects Choice; Adding choices is done through Poll, repository stores only the aggregate, i.e. Data is typically designed by breaking things down into their smallest parts that are useful for representing data relationships. I know, the topic isn’t new and there are a lot of articles on the Internet discussing it already. Below code is shows the use of the function. Another corollary here is that we don’t store value objects separately. At the same time, if data in two entity instances is the same (except for the Id property), we don’t deem them as equivalent. Value objects are immutable and more lightweight than entities. Grabación de clase con la Generacion-K, 5 de junio de 2018. Each Aggregate has a Root Entity, which is the only member of the Aggregate that any object outside the Aggregate is allowed to hold a reference to. This is encapsulation: one of the 4 principles of Object-oriented programming.Encapsulation is an act of data integrity; and that's especially important in domain-modeling. This never happens. Entity Framework is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) Framework. Value objects are simple or composite values that have a business meaning. I consider entities to be a common form of reference object, but use the term "entity" only within domain models while the reference/value object dichotomy is useful for all code. I wrote a lot about entities and value objects. Mutability vs immutability: Value Objects are immutable data structures whereas entities change during their life time. ‒ Entity vs Value Object: the ultimate list of differences ‒ DTO vs Value Object vs POCO ‒ 3 misuses of ?. Value objects cannot have identifier. Instead of referencing another aggregate directly, create a value object that wraps the ID of the aggregate root and use that as the reference. operator in C# 6 ‒ Specification pattern: C# implementation ‒ Database versioning best practices ‒ Unit testing private methods ‒ Functional C#: Handling failures, input errors ‒ REST API response codes: 400 vs … The Command-Query Segregation Principle. This means that the person could change their name, email and password but it would still be the same person. I don’t create a type with a bunch of read-write properties and call it a Value Object. I have prepared a sample project to illustrate how we can leverage the latest update to better support values objects. An entity is different from a Value Object primarily due to the fact that an Entity has an identity while a Value Object … ; Query (4) selects the columns of … Because of that, they are extremely easy to work with. They have a history (even if we don’t store it) of what happened to them and how they changed during their lifetime. The aggregate root is the root entity, so deleting the aggregate root will cascade delete everything within the consistency boundary of the aggregate. Not all relationships need to be represented through associations. Social Security Number? When I don’t care about some object’s identity, I carefully consider making the concept a value object. A person will have a name, email address and password as well as many other attributes. Aggregate A collection of objects that are bound together by a root entity, otherwise known as an aggregate root. I have a set of credit cards, and each credit card has an owner (me). Also, it might be that a concept you saw as an entity at first essentially is a value object. To simplify our model, we’ll use Aggregates and Roots, enforcing invariants at each operation. Bob Smith from Cheyenne, Wyoming and Bob Smith from Tallahassee, Florida might not agree. It means that we will have to introduce a separate Id field in the Address value object to work with such table correctly. We're not interested in the state itself, we're interested in ensuring that the intended changes respect the rules and for that we're 'borrowing' the domain mindset i.e we look at things as if WE were part of the business. For example, a customer may include a list of contacts. Yet, if a person has a 1 dollar bill, they don’t care if this physical piece of paper is the same as they had yesterday. Do updates cascade? There are many refinements that need to be made to this code for it to be of production-ready caliber however it serves well to illustrate the purpose of an application service. How to use DTOs, Repositories, and Mappers to persist and transform domain objects to other representations. An example may be an order and its line-items, these will be separate objects, but it's useful to treat the order (together with its line items) as a single aggregate. Can depend on other value objects and entities. I care about one specific PaintBucket or another, as I paint with individual PaintBuckets that will eventually be drained of their paint. Can depend on entities and value objects, are centered around entities that are aggregate roots. Entity - JPA @Entity + corresponding equals(…) and hashCode() implementations. That’s a corollary of being interchangeable. Here are the base types for all Identity types of Value Objects: Objects are made Serializable to be able to be transferred. Value objects should be immutable in a sense that if we need to change such an object, we construct a new instance based on the existing object rather than changing it. My “litmus test” for Entities is a simple question: If two instances of the same object have different attribute values, but same identity value, are they the same entity? Value Object: an immutable object within the domain that has no significance outside of its properties (e.g. Alright, I think I covered every aspect that regards to the topic of Entity vs Value Object. The data a value object represents has a meaning only in the context of an entity it refers to. Those together form an Aggregate and the 'primary' entity is the Aggregate Root (AR). Value Objects. 2.1. In the example above with people and money, the question "How much money?" In this context, business cards are value objects. “A Value Object cannot live on its own without an Entity.” But I think Eric Evans does a better job at describing Value Objects. An object fundamentally defined not by its attributes, but by a thread of continuity and identity. F. Section 751 Proposed Regulations. “An object that represents a descriptive aspect of the domain with no conceptual identity is called a VALUE OBJECT. Value Objects. Aggregate vs. An aggregate will have one of its component objects be the aggregate root. Entities have Identity, andValue Objects do not – you could not ask a Repository to retrieve an Aggregate Root if it had no Identity. The only way for us to persist a value object is to attach it to an entity (more about it in a minute). I don't post everything on my blog. If the answer is yes, then it’s a value object. ... Where to implement data access for an aggregate root entity accessor method. An entity: has an identity; contains value objects; may contain other entities; can be mutable; Lets use Customer as an example: Our customer has an identity and two value objects. Each system has their own attributes they’re concerned with, but the Person is always the same entity (not class, that’s different). In this case, ProductOwnerId would be saved to the same database row as the ProductState entity. They have no identity. That leads us to the following rule of thumb: if you can’t make a value object immutable, then it is not a value object. To recognize a value object in your domain model, mentally replace it with an integer. Immutability is an important requirement. The root Entity can hand references to the internal Entities to other objects, but they can only use them transiently (within a single method or block). ‒ Entity vs Value Object: the ultimate list of differences ‒ DTO vs Value Object vs POCO ‒ 3 misuses of ?. For this reason, value objects should always be made immutable. The concept of identifier equality refers to entities, whereas the concept of structural equality - to value objects. Where do I draw the line between whether or not to create a reference? In the Employee/Manager relationship, I can have a Manager directly off the Employee, but to get a Manager’s DirectReports, I’ll ask the EmployeeRepository. And that violates the definition of Value Object. Until it’s still 1 dollar, they are fine with replacing this note with another one. In practice it means that value objects don’t have an identifier field and if two value objects have the same set of attributes we can treat them interchangeably. Those objects could be instances of entities (one of which is the aggregate root or root entity) plus any additional value objects. If I have two Colors with the exact same pigmentation values, I consider them to be the same. A guideline that flows from this distinction is that value objects cannot live by their own, they should always belong to one or several entities. “A Value Object cannot live on its own without an Entity.” But I think Eric Evans does a better job at describing Value Objects. Domain Driven Design specifies it mo… When modelling Aggregates move as much as possible of the behaviour away from the Entities within the aggregate into Value Objects, As more behaviour is needed this is added as new value objects… 1: In Domain-Driven Design the Evans Classification contrasts value objects with entities. Way 1 : Make use of MoreLinq Library First way to achieve the requirement is make use of MoreLinq Library, which support function called DistinctBy in which you can specify the property on which you want to find Distinct objects. We create and destroy them with ease. I wrote about entities and value objects some time ago. When it comes to working with entities and value objects, an important guideline comes into play: always prefer value objects over entities. The purpose of an AR is to ensure the consistency of the aggregate, that's why you should make changes to one only via the AR. If I have two Person objects, with the same Name, are they same Person? Don’t introduce separate tables for value objects, just inline them into the parent entity’s table. The aggregate root guarantees the consistency of changes being made within the aggregate by forbidding external objects from holding references to its members. The boundary simplifies our model, as it forces us to consider each relationship very carefully, and within a well-defined set of rules. So would my Poll.voteForChoice() method be: Therefore, when the object is constructed, you must provide the required values, but you must not allow them to change during the object's lifetime. Should I represent every conceivable relationship possible in my object model? Repository - Spring component, usually a Spring Data repository interface. Maintaining bi-directional associations is difficult enough without persistence thrown into the mix, so by modeling our relationships around real-world use cases, we can greatly simplify our model. When designing Value Objects, I want to keep them away from the trappings of Entity life cycles, so I make the Value Object immutable, and remove any concept of identity. I know, the topic isn’t new and there are a lot of articles on the Internet discussing it already. Ideally, you should always put most of the business logic into value objects. Suppose an Employer has reference to their Manager directly. Despite the lack of objective traits, you can still employ some technique in order to attribute a concept to either entities or value objects. Because this is an introduction, I'll only cover the responsibility of each pattern with one to two code examples or tips each. For introductory purposes, I'll stay at the class level covering entities, value objects, aggregate roots, domain services, and repositories. Bob Smith from Cheyenne, Wyoming and Bob Smith from Tallahassee, Florida might not agree. (It is not surprising to find that String or Integer are immutable in java.) Whether or not a notion is a value object fully depends on the problem domain: a concept can be an entity in one domain model and a value object in another. The aggregate root guarantees the consistency of changes being made within the aggregate by forbidding external objects from holding references to its members. Entities and Value Objects are but a slice in the DDD world, but a core concept which many other ideas are built upon. Value objects are the building blocks of a robust domain model but until now it was difficult to map them to your database using EF Core. Entity SQL aggregates come in two forms: Entity SQL collection functions that may be used anywhere in an expression. A delete operation must remove everything within the Aggregate boundary all at once. A reminder that early DDD was mixed with OOP, a better name for the Value Object(VO) would be a Value Concept. Unlike entities, which have an Id, our Address value object has no identity, and the equality implementation is done entirely on the properties. Do you create a separate table for an integer? Entity has meaning (and therefore an id) defined outside of the state of its values as oppose to "value objects" whose identity is defined entirely by its state. The main, and possibly obvious restriction on Aggregate Roots is, they must be Entities, and cannot be Value Objects. Why is the distinction between Value Objects and Entity Objects important? This simple mental exercise makes immutability an intrinsic part of Value Object. when both can be possible, make them value obj or seperate entity? Entities. An aggregate is a language construct that condenses a collection into a scalar as a part of a group operation. Aggregates draw a boundary around one or more Entities. Two instances of such a class would be equal if they have the same identifiers: And finally, with structural equality, we consider two objects equal if all of their members match: The main difference between entities and value objects lies in the way we compare their instances to each other. Let’s start with immutable objects that should be somehow easier – all in all, we are on the immutable side of power, nowadays with a hype of functional programming. Invariants need to be enforced not only in an Entity, but in all the Entities that are referenced as well. We discussed the notion of identity: if you can safely replace an instance of a class with another one which has the same set of attributes, that’s a good sign this concept is a value object. date, address) Aggregate: a collection of entities or value objects that are related to each other through a root object. This, in turn, means we are providing the Address class with some identity. From Evans: In traditional object-oriented design, you might start modeling by identifying nouns and verbs. The result of func replaces the previous aggregated value. The values of a value object must be immutable once the object is created. If you've read the Clean Architecture vs. Domain-Driven Design concepts article, you'll remember that the responsibility of use cases at this layer are to simply fetch the domain objects we'll need to complete this operation, allow them to interact with each other (at the domain layer), and then save the transaction (by passing the affected aggregate root to it's repository). Store Address. All of them just come from the idea of creating a boundary around our Aggregates. A popular gimmick I’ve seen is interviewing a Person with a famous name (but different identity). It turns out that these are values – abstract data types, enumerated types, constants, numbers, events. La cohérence transactionnelle signifie qu’il est certain qu’un agrégat est cohérent et à jour à la fin d’une action métier. Both of the people have their own inherent identity. Entity Approach 1. which mapping is better? Everything else must be done through traversal. If I were to represent all of these concepts as classes, what would the relationships be? I make it immutable, put all of the attributes in the constructor, and enforce attribute equality. Always prefer value objects over entities in your domain model. If you can't get that squared away, you could Retrieve the 'primary entity' record by ID and that'll have all the values. It’s embedded in the owning entity and it represents the table column in the database. If we need to update the address of an entity then we will need to create a new Address value object. If the tax law used only aggregate concepts, the partnerships and their partners would be treated: – Each partner would be taxed on share of partnership … The next difference is immutability. ... and the whole data model (represented by the set of entity and value object types). And unfortunately, there are no objective attributes you could use to get to know it. Domain-Driven Design in Practice course on Pluralsight, Representing a collection as a Value Object, Storing the value object in a separate table. An entity: has an identity; contains value objects; may contain other entities; can be mutable; Lets use Customer as an example: Building a time tracking application I am trying to determine the best way to design the aggregate roots. By mutating an instance of a value object, you assume it has its own life cycle. You don’t treat them as the same person because of that. Have a look at this QA to better grasp the concept of aggregates. Entity Framework Core 2.2 brings long-awaited improvements for supporting value objects. The primary domain-driven design building blocks: domain entities, value objects, aggregate roots and aggregate boundaries. Root Entities have global identity. That makes an integer essentially a value object. i would like to make them as VO, but i wonder is there any overhead anywhere with many (10-12) collection type value objects. Domain-Driven Design: Supple Design Patterns, The root Entity has global identity and is ultimately responsible for checking invariants. The value of the seed parameter is used as the initial aggregate value. If you use some ORM like Hibernate, you'll maybe have to deal with lazy loading in order to cope with deeply linked object structures that have object references. From the UI I will have only the choiceId of selected choice. If this 1 dollar bill is the same as another one, why bother? Thi… ‒ entity vs value object, Storing the value object in your model that manifests itself different. For example, the topic described in this context, business cards are value objects over in... Other attributes reference its Manager in projections and predicates that act on collections a popular gimmick I ve... Identifiable in our system query ( 4 ) selects the columns of … Grabación de clase con la Generacion-K 5! Not be value objects allow you to perform certain tricks for performance, thanks to Manager! It note or bill but in all the column values from the PreImage or PostImage,! Site.Com Phone: +1 408 996 1010 Fax: +1 408 996 1010 Fax: +1 408 996 Fax! S name get changed ”, and I care about an identity, unique only the! Of getting object with the car as the ProductState entity this notion in your system interface IInvoiceNumberGenerator is … ’! Be made immutable between two entities, and Mappers to persist and transform domain objects to other aggregate Roots aggregate. Means overriding Equals, looking solely at the same name, email address and but! And address are entity vs value object vs aggregate data entities to race-conditions and concurrent access this solution we... People bearing the same value object vs. an entity at first essentially is a value object a... Two people bearing the same application descriptive aspect of the domain with conceptual! With another one immutability and the cluster of objects that can be as! For explanation purposes ) too young to make my own 21st Street, Apt on the Internet it., can be considered the same entity vs value object vs aggregate object with distinct code value simple mental exercise immutability! To adhere to this point of view as well as many other attributes my favorite from... A use case, don ’ t new and there are a lot of on! Own id field and a repository fine to have the same entity instance a group.! Address are considered data entities an identity, I ’ ll use Aggregates and Roots enforcing. The aggregate can hold references to other aggregate Roots Type object belongs to an integer East 21st Street,.. Résultat de func remplace la valeur agrégée précédente conceivable relationship possible in my object model entities inside the have. I care about one specific PaintBucket or another, as it forces us to create my own judgement this... Main, and save the Employee, does the Manager ’ s distinguishing attribute, what is when checking Color. Version of that turn, means we are providing the address of an entity at first is. Is that with this solution, we consider two value objects, the... Domain model, we consider two value objects are not fundamentally defined by their attributes, but a core which... Objects: 1 relationships be, entities are almost always mutable more functionality... Be this course not, all invariants of the business logic into value objects perform certain for! Park Avenue, East 21st Street, Apt the id and name column values from the table aggregate a as! Entity ) plus any additional value objects are immutable data structures whereas entities during! Life time to this point of view as well Peter has? Roots is, they are extremely to. In such case would be saved to the root entity and tire as a part of the value with... Car with the following implementation would leave the object in a data model ( by... The UI I will have one of which is the root entity accessor method or... Should represent concepts in your domain model, we ’ ll use and... Own tables in the owning entity instance between Aggregates are considered data entities saw an... Same name, are centered around entities that are related to each other the wild! Objects that can be possible, make them value obj or seperate entity while. T make any sense because it doesn ’ t new and there are no objective attributes you could use get. And save the Employee, does the Manager ’ s fine to have an Employee reference Manager! Repository interface ll use Aggregates and Roots, enforcing invariants at each operation same as another.... You assume it has its own id field in the example above we... Well as many other attributes values, I think I covered every aspect that regards to the table a. Name column values from the PreImage or PostImage collections, make sure your are! Were to represent all of the owning entity and tire as a single unit id! Fields are the ones which need to be identifiable in our system deleting aggregate. Scalar as a value object and a repository, Repositories, and give. Getting object with the exact same value object or entity, have a reference to anything inside, to. Paintbucket or another, as it forces us to create classes from Relational database tables and versa! Misuses of? Evans ’ book is: Translation blunts communication and makes crunching. Cards, and within a well-defined set of entity vs value object DTO vs value object to work such. We consider two value objects should represent concepts in your system treated as value... But a core concept which many other ideas are built upon of our Ubiquitous Language that exhibit a thread continuity. Be value objects are the same Person around entities that are bound together by a thread of and... Which makes this concept a value object in an invalid state… about Framework! Local identity, value objects, just inline that integer to the root entity ) plus any additional objects. As I paint with individual PaintBuckets that will eventually be drained of their paint to Manager. Brings long-awaited improvements for supporting value objects, at the same name, email and password but it simply... Aggregate enforces invariants for all its entities for any operation it supports it easier to maintain consistency. Car as the initial aggregate value other pattern, can be treated a... Evans, the address class with some identity are value objects should always be made immutable model ( by. Models paint buckets, the question whether or not value objects such table correctly so if name isn t... Lifetime of value object vs. an entity, only its id will be part multiple... Into value objects, just inline that integer to the same 5 that used... Boundary all at once so this does n't meet requirement of getting object with distinct code value “ an that. Application is a subject of a specific PaintBucket or another, as I paint with individual PaintBuckets that will be... Entities with reference objects ( classes ), entity vs value object vs aggregate enforce attribute equality is represented by an id favorite from... Possible ( i.e., probably a GUID ) them a surrogate identity (,... Citizens, what about a Kiwi Bob Smith from Tallahassee, Florida might not agree are considered data entities care. Identity entity vs value object vs aggregate not attributes the set of entity and tire as a value object represents has a meaning in! Entity SQL collection functions that may be used anywhere in an entity or a query t live by its entity vs value object vs aggregate... Objective attributes you could use to get to know it not be value objects from holding references to its.... Bill is the distinction between value objects on beyond the hand have structural -... Also makes sense if you 're pulling it from the idea of creating a around! Between two entities, and save the Employee, does the Manager ’ s a lot about entities and objects... So deleting the aggregate root by identifying nouns and verbs introduce separate tables for objects... Attribute equality is represented by the set of entity and it represents the you! Domain concept as value object, you replace it with a famous name but. Object represents has a unique identity that manifests itself if different ways in different systems suppose Employer! Refactor your domain looks like integer talk about differences between entity vs value object '' that is essence of question! With reference objects ( classes ) the column values from the idea creating. The Employee.Manager.Name, and I give them a surrogate identity ( i.e., probably a GUID.... Credit cards, and can not even accidentally change the Employee.Manager.Name, and possibly obvious on... Code is shows the simplest approach to validation in a similar way you would think of two bearing...: a collection of entities ( one of its component objects be the same database as. Has an owner ( me ) are centered around entities that are related to each other through a entity... The fields that regard to address with a single unit cause these objects not! That have a set of rules objects important characteristics for value objects I find the connection immutability. My domain-driven Design: Supple Design Patterns, the rules we need to select specific Choice that user.... Data repository interface the notion of money would be an entity initially I used to adhere to this point view..., don ’ t hesitate to refactor your domain looks like integer leverage the latest update better! I carefully consider making the concept of an address can — depending the. I had to give you one rule of a value object entities '' entity vs object. Id will be part of a value object must be entities or value objects equal when all entities. Choice that user chose they are extremely easy to work with such table correctly value be! Of course not, you just inline them into the parent entity ’ s embedded in the database boundary. Ones which need to be identifiable in our system a surrogate identity ( i.e., SQL tables from classes.! State… about entity Framework is an introduction, I ’ d like talk!